![]()
|
![]() Home | Clinical Café Archive | April 2005
Scoring Nuances of the Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language
April 2005 Clinical Café The Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL) is fast becoming "the test of choice" for identifying oral language skills in children and young adults aged 3 to 21. As more and more examiners use the CASL, specific questions arise about the administration of the instrument. This article will address questions that have been posed regarding the basal and ceiling rules. Dr. Elizabeth Carrow-Woolfolk, author of the CASL, has made the administration particularly logical and straightforward. It is, however, the examiner's responsibility to have a thorough knowledge of the administration instructions for each of the fifteen tests in the CASL test battery. It is essential that each examiner read the Examiner's Manual thoroughly before administering this or any other standardized assessment instrument. Unless the CASL, or any other standardized test, is administered in the same manner utilized during the standardization process, the results obtained may not be interpretable. (Examiner's Manual, p. 68). Before we address specific questions, it might be helpful to review some of the guidelines contained in the Examiner's Manual for obtaining accurate results. Consider the special needs of the examinee. (Examiner's Manual. p. 30, 31, 68.)
Adhere to the prompting, repetition, basal, and ceiling rules. (E.M ibid. p. 7, 69.)
Specifics on Basal and Ceiling Rules Double Basal/Double Ceiling What is Dr. Carrow-Woolfolk's rationale for using the lowest basal and the highest ceiling when obtaining raw scores on the CASL? The goal in the testing world is to capture the most complete view of a child's abilities. The lowest basal and highest ceiling rule allows you to obtain as much information as you can without tiring or frustrating the examinee by administering too many items that are either too easy or too difficult for him/her. Earned Ceiling vs. Tested Ceiling What should the examiner do when an open-ended question is administered and the examiner is not sure that the response is correct? In this case, the examiner should not break the continuity of the test administration. The examiner should continue administering items until he or she is sure a ceiling is met, checking questionable responses after the test is complete. Does the highest ceiling rule apply in this case? When the examiner goes back to score the test, he or she should keep in mind that the child's performance drives where the ceiling is, not the examiner's decision to keep testing. So, if the examiner, after the fact, scores a child's response as incorrect and that creates a child's "earned" ceiling, then that is the ceiling to be used. Click here for "Frequently Asked Questions" on CASL SLP Discussion Center
As always, we'd like to thank you for your ongoing service to people with communication
needs and to remind you that we are here to support you in that effort. If
you'd like to discuss this topic further, please feel free to use the SLP
Discussion Center as the vehicle for an ongoing discussion with your
colleagues. Should you have questions regarding these or other Pearson
Speech
and Language products, we welcome your phone calls at 800-627-7271 or use
our web site at http://ags.pearsonassessments.com.
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||